<< Previous Post | Main | Next Post >>

Tax-Exempt Groups Under Investigation, Take II

A few weeks back I put together this post highlighting how the IRS is investigating the tax-exempt status of groups like the NAACP for "engaging in political activities", and at the time, I suggested that if they were going to do that, they should be consistent and apply the policy to religious groups as well. If the rule is that engaging in "political activities" means that you lose tax-exempt status even for "activities that encourage people to vote for or against a particular candidate on the basis of nonpartisan criteria violate the political campaign prohibition," then, well... doesn't this clearly qualify?
As the presidential race was heating up in June and July, a pair of leaked documents showed that the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign was urging Christian supporters to turn over their church directories and was seeking to identify "friendly congregations" in battleground states.

Those revelations produced a flurry of accusations that the Bush campaign was leading churches to violate laws against partisan activities by tax-exempt organizations, and even some of the White House's closest religious allies said the campaign had gone too far.

But the untold story of the 2004 election, according to national religious leaders and grass-roots activists, is that evangelical Christian groups were often more aggressive and sometimes better organized on the ground than the Bush campaign. The White House struggled to stay abreast of the Christian right and consulted with the movement's leaders in weekly conference calls. But in many respects, Christian activists led the charge that GOP operatives followed and capitalized upon.

This was particularly true of the same-sex marriage issue. One of the most successful tactics of social conservatives -- the ballot referendums against same-sex marriage in 13 states -- bubbled up from below and initially met resistance from White House aides, Christian leaders said.

In dozens of interviews since the election, grass-roots activists in Ohio, Michigan and Florida credited President Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, with setting a clear goal that became a mantra among conservatives: To win, Bush had to draw 4 million more evangelicals to the polls than he did in 2000. But they also described a mobilization of evangelical Protestants and conservative Roman Catholics that took off under its own power.

In battlegrounds such as Ohio, scores of clergy members attended legal sessions explaining how they could talk about the election from the pulpit. Hundreds of churches launched registration drives, thousands of churchgoers registered to vote, and millions of voter guides were distributed by Christian and antiabortion groups.

The rallying cry for many social conservatives was opposition to same-sex marriage. But concern about the Supreme Court, abortion, school prayer and pornography also motivated these "values voters." Same-sex marriage, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, was "the hood ornament on the family values wagon that carried the president to a second term."

Laws mean nothing if not enforced fairly and equally. That is one of the most basic principles upon which our government was founded. If this is not a clear case of selective enforcement based on political preferences, I have no idea what is...

Since the election I've been struggling to determine just what I was going to use this blog for. I think I've found it. Nothing infuriates me more than hypocricy. Perpare to share my pain.


--------

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Tax-Exempt Groups Under Investigation, Take II.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.alexwhalen.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1543

Leave a comment